Howard K. Stern's motion to dismiss a law suit filed against him by Virgie Arthur for lack of jurisdiction has been denied. The court has decided that it does have jurisdiction over Stern as well as several bloggers and is going to continue with the case.
What I don't understand is this, how can they possibly prove that Stern made Anna Nicole make comments on television about Virgie Arthur. You can't just make an assumption and have no facts to back it. You would have to have some sort of witness coming forward saying he had a gun to her back and made her do it, or some other threat.
I don't know, it just all seems like a waste of time and money to me. I would be really suprised if Stern were to be held liable for Anna's words.
